Enabling participatory planning

Planning aid and advocacy in neoliberal times

By Gavin Parker and Emma Street

Enabling participatory planning
  • Published:

    28 Mar 2018
  • Page count:

    144 pages
  • ISBN:

    978-1447341390
  • Product Dimensions:

    129 x 198 mm
  • £40.00 £32.00You save £8.00 (20%)
  • Add to basket
  • Published:

    28 Mar 2018
  • Page count:

    144 pages
  • ISBN:

    978-1447341413
  • Product Dimensions:

    129 x 198 mm
  • £6.99 £5.59You save £1.40 (20%)
  • Add to basket
  • Published:

    28 Mar 2018
  • Page count:

    144 pages
  • ISBN:

    978-1447341420
  • Product Dimensions:

    129 x 198 mm
  • £6.99 £5.59You save £1.40 (20%)
  • Buy from Amazon.co.uk

This book examines the challenges in delivering a participatory planning agenda in the face of an increasingly neoliberalised planning system and charts the experience of Planning Aid England.

In an age of austerity, government spending cuts, privatisation and rising inequalities, the need to support and include the most vulnerable in society is more acute than ever. However, forms of Advocacy Planning, the progressive concept championed for this purpose since the 1960s, is under threat from neoliberalisation.

Rather than abandoning advocacy, the book asserts that only through sustained critical engagement will issues of exclusion be positively tackled and addressed. The authors propose neo-advocacy planning as the critical lens through which to effect positive change. This, they argue, will need to draw on a co-production model maintained through a well-resourced special purpose organisation set up to mobilise and resource planning intermediaries whose role it is to activate, support and educate those without the resources to secure such advocacy themselves.

Gavin Parker is Professor of Planning Studies at the University of Reading, UK and has written extensively on the topics of citizenship and participation in planning, including neighbourhood planning. For two years (2012–14) he directed Planning Aid England.

Emma Street is Associate Professor of Planning and Urban Governance at the University of Reading, UK. Emma’s research focuses on urban governance, policy and planning, and architecture and urban design.

Introduction: engaging in planning

Neoliberal times and participation in planning

Advocacy planning: then and now

Advocacy and Planning Aid in England

Neo-advocacy and contemporary issues in progressive planning

Conclusion: embedding neo-advocacy in planning systems

"Parker and Street's well-informed book sets out an interesting proposal for securing greater justice within planning. It is sure to provoke intense discussion within professional and political circles." Huw Thomas, Cardiff University

About the book

This book examines the challenges in delivering a participatory planning agenda in the face of an increasingly neoliberalised planning system and charts the experience of Planning Aid England.

In an age of austerity, government spending cuts, privatisation and rising inequalities, the need to support and include the most vulnerable in society is more acute than ever. However, forms of Advocacy Planning, the progressive concept championed for this purpose since the 1960s, is under threat from neoliberalisation.

Rather than abandoning advocacy, the book asserts that only through sustained critical engagement will issues of exclusion be positively tackled and addressed. The authors propose neo-advocacy planning as the critical lens through which to effect positive change. This, they argue, will need to draw on a co-production model maintained through a well-resourced special purpose organisation set up to mobilise and resource planning intermediaries whose role it is to activate, support and educate those without the resources to secure such advocacy themselves.

Content

Introduction: engaging in planning

Neoliberal times and participation in planning

Advocacy planning: then and now

Advocacy and Planning Aid in England

Neo-advocacy and contemporary issues in progressive planning

Conclusion: embedding neo-advocacy in planning systems

Related Titles