Evidence & Policy

A journal of research, debate & practice

  • Editors

    Annette Boaz, Faculty of Health and Social Care Sciences, St. George's, University of London & Kingston University, UK 

    David Gough, EPPI Centre, UCL Institute of Education University College London, UK

  • Frequency

    Four issues per annum: January, May, August and November

  • ISSN

    1744 2648 (print)

    1744-2656 (online)

  • Impact factor

    0.908 (2yr), 1.441 (5yr)

  • Rank

    52 of 96 in Social Science, Interdisciplinary

Evidence & Policy is the first peer-reviewed journal dedicated to comprehensive and critical assessment of the relationship between research evidence and the concerns of policy makers and practitioners, as well as researchers. 

International in scope and interdisciplinary in focus, it addresses the needs of those who provide public services, and those who provide the research base for evaluation and development across a wide range of social and public policy issues – from social care to education, from public health to criminal justice. 

As well as more traditional research articles, the journal includes contemporary debate pieces, articles from practice and an invaluable sources and resources section.

 

What people are saying about Evidence & Policy

“Evidence & Policy is the journal that helps me to keep up to date with the latest thinking and research in this field and the Sources and Resources section is invaluable”. Sandra Nutley, Professor of Public Policy and Management, School of Management, University of St Andrews

"It is crucial to understand how the use of solid evidence can improve policy advice, and improve professional service delivery practices. Evidence & Policy stepped boldly into this emerging field a decade ago, and helped define the issues, advance understandings, and improve professional practices.  I look forward to the next 10 years, and beyond, as it helps to shape the future of the field." Professor Brian Head FASSA, ARC Professorial Fellow, Institute for Social Science Research &       School of Political Science, The University of Queensland, Australia

"This journal contributes significantly to our understanding of how and where evidence influences policy not only by broadening the horizons of researchers and policy makers on what counts in the decision process, but by its focus on experience in the field." Fred Carden, Director, Evaluation, International Development Research Centre, Canada

"This is a journal that many researchers, decision makers and public service providers have been waiting for." Professor Haluk Soydan, University of Southern California 

“Evidence-based policy is the watchword today in many countries and with many international organizations. This journal is the place to explore its many meanings, how it is operationalized and how it works. A journal worth reading!” Professor Tom Cook, Northwestern University


Abstracting and indexing

Evidence & Policy was awarded the impact factor of 1.080 in the 2014 Journal Citation Reports published by Thomson Reuters in July 2015. It is also ranked 25th out of 95 journals in its category of Social Science, Interdisciplinary.

Evidence & Policy is abstracted in the Social Sciences Citation Index and Current Contents/Social and Behavioral Sciences, PsycINFO, International Bibliography of Social Sciences (IBSS), CSA (Sociological abstracts; British Humanities Index), Social Policy & Practice, Social Care Online, Elsevier bibliographic databases (including Scopus; Geobase; Compendex; EMNursing and Mosby yearbooks), Centre for Policy on Ageing, International Political Science Abstracts, Zetoc (through the British Library). 

Evidence and Policy Special Issue: Networks in Evidence, Policy and Practice

Guest-edited by Kathryn Oliver, Moira Faul, Jordan Tchilingirian

The evidence-policy relationship is complex, and affected by many factors, including relationships and interpersonal networks (Haynes 2011, Lewis 2006). These networks are affected by political, social, economic, and legislative contexts (Lavis 2003, Lomas and Brown 2009), and the characteristics and agency of actors (Callon 1999, Faul 2015). We know that patterns of social interactions, or networks, underpin policy processes (Oliver 2012), yet the role of these networks is not yet well characterised.

The Special Issue proposed examines the utility of network approaches in evidence and policy. Understanding the structure and nature of the ties linking policy [and evidence?] actors can inform us about how knowledge exchange occurs (Haynes 2011, Oliver 2012), the conditions under which evidence can inform policy (Ingold 2011, Christopolous 2011, Fischer 2011), or which salient actors are involved in and excluded from decision-making (Faul 2015) Network concepts and approaches therefore open up new perspectives on the question of how policy and evidence interact. In addition to being a field of significant academic inquiry, “networks” in evidence, policy and practice have also been applied in a more practical sense. Interventions aiming to promote the development and use of networks to disseminate evidence and evidence-informed behaviours are increasingly frequently described in the literature (Valente 2009, Christakis 2013). Networks are also described as a means to bring policy and evidence “communities” together by creating links between individuals and organisations.

We invite papers on all aspects of studying networks and policy, including (but not limited to):

  • theoretical or methodological questions, such as the use of network metrics to identify key players in policy processes, typologies of network measures and ties which illuminate the policy process, or multi-modal networks and their role in understanding evidence-based policy making
  • substantive cases, such as the role of think-tanks or other formal and informal institutions in policy, individual cases of policy and/or evidence networks, or the role of elites in influencing knowledge and power within policy
  • The roles of intermediaries and other types of actors on the structure and effectiveness of evidence and policy networks
  • comparative cases, in which multiple approaches and cases are compared
  • practical descriptions of how networks have been created and implemented, and the effects of such networks on the use of research evidence 

This special issue will bring together theoretical, methodological and contemporary empirical work exploring the use of network approaches to understand the relationship between evidence and policy. We seek to provoke discussion on the utility of network approaches for understanding policy and evidence, the limitations to such approaches, and the likely next steps for collaborative research.

 

All papers must be submitted online at http://www.editorialmanager.com/evidpol/default.aspx by 1 October 2017 and include a note specifying that the paper is being submitted for this special issue.

Please consult the Journal’s Instructions for Authors: http://policypress.co.uk/journals/evidence-and-policy

 

Dr Kathryn Oliver

Kathryn.oliver@spi.ox.ac.uk

Recently published papers include:

The Carol Weiss Prize 2017

To mark the tenth anniversay of Evidence & Policy, the journal launched an annual prize which recognises outstanding early career contributors to the journal. The prize was created in memory of Professor Carol Weiss, the first North American Editor of Evidence & Policy and a pioneer in the field, and it was awarded for the first time in 2016 to Dr William Allen (Centre on Migration, Policy and Society, University of Oxford) for his paper 'Factors that impact how civil society organisations perceive evidence'

Prize

Each year a prize of £100-worth of Policy Press books will be awarded to the winner.  The paper will be made freely available for a period of three months and promoted widely.

 

Eligibility

The competition is open to early career contributors to Evidence & Policy.  Applicants must be the first author of a paper published or accepted for publication since the beginning of 2015 and must be able to demonstrate that they are at an early stage in their career, e.g. have completed a PhD no more than four years ago. Applicants are asked to submit, with their paper,  a short supporting statement, which should outline briefly (maximum 2 sides of A4 12pt) why the contributor should be awarded the Carol Weiss Prize.

 

Assessment Criteria 

A panel involving Editorial Board members will judge the applications on the written material provided; applicatns will not be required to attend an interview.  The assessment criteria are:

  • Original and promising contribution to the journal
  • Early career researcher (this is broadly defined but must be justified by applicants)
  • Research papers only
  • Demonstrates rigorous social science methods and theory
  • Novel contribution to evidence and policy studies
  • Accepted or published in 2017 or the previous 24 months 

 

The winner

There will be one winner each year who will be asked to participate in some promotional activities for the publisher, Policy Press and will be ale to present their reearch to an invited audeince on acceptance of the prize, as part of a conference or seminar. 

 

Timeline

  • Call for applications issued – end of January 2017
  • Applications deadline – end of June 2017
  • Shortlisting panel meeting – July 2017
  • Awards announcement – September 2017
  • Presentation of award – early 2018 

 

Contact us

For more information about the Evidence & Policy Carol Weiss Prize please contact us at a.boaz@sgul.kingston.ac.uk 

Management Board

Annette Boaz
 (Joint Managing Editor), Faculty of Health and Social Care Sciences, St. George's, University of London & Kingston University, UK 
David Gough (Joint Managing Editor), Institute of Education, University of London, UK 

Melanie Barwick (Associate Editor), Sick Kids, Canada
Anita Kothari (Associate Editor), Western University, Canada
Sarah Morton (Associate Editor), University of Edinburgh, UK
Zachary Neal (Associate Editor), Michigan State University, USA
Kathryn Oliver (Associate Editor), University of Oxford, UK
Mark Pearson (Associate Editor), University of Exeter, UK
Louise Shaxson  (Associate Editor), Overseas Development Institute
Vivian Tseng (Associate Editor), William T. Grant Foundation, USA
Ewan Ferlie (Chair of the Board), King's College London, UK
Julia Mortimer (Publisher), Policy Press, University of Bristol, UK 
 
 
Editorial Advisory Board 
 
The editorial team at Evidence & Policy is supported by a distinguished international advisory board, including: 
 
Fred Carden, RTI International, Indonesia
Cynthia Coburn, Northwestern University, USA
Ian Goldman, The Presidency, South Africa
Brian Head, University of Queensland, Australia
John Lavis, McMaster University, Canada
Cynthia Lum, George Mason University, USA
Jordi Molas-Gallart, INGENIO, Universitat Politècnica de València, Spain 
Lawrence Palinkas, University of Southern California, USA
Jack B. Spaapen, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, Netherlands

What are we looking for?

How to Submit

Copyright

Style

References

English Language Editing Service

Open Access

Self-archiving and institutional repositories

How to maximise the impact of your article (PDF)

Integration and Implementation Insights Blog

Contact Us

 

What are we looking for?

Four types of papers are accepted in Evidence & Policy, all of which should address the relationship between evidence and policy, as described below. Contributions are not restricted to specific disciplines or policy areas, but should offer new insights or describe research or practice that develops the field.

  1. Research articles describe an original piece of research (primary or secondary) that has relevance to the relationship between evidence and policy or to methodological issues in this field. All research articles are expected to contribute to the field of evidence and policy, advancing theoretical or methodological debates, or otherwise making novel contributions. Shorter papers of up to 5000 words are encouraged, but the maximum limit is 8000. This includes the references and tables, but not the abstract, key words or key messages. Each research article must include the following sections:
  • Up to four keywords.
  • ‘Key messages’: summarising the main messages from the paper in up to four bullet points. The contribution made by the paper to the field should be clear from these key messages. Each bullet point must be less than 100 characters.
  • Abstract: a structured abstract (up to 250 words), which covers briefly the background, aims and objectives, methods, findings, discussion and conclusions.
  • Background: explaining the nature and importance of the research question being addressed and usually including a detailed literature review, and outlining any relevant theoretical or epistemological stances.
  • Methods: this should include enough information on methods of data collection and analysis for readers to understand exactly what was done and why. The choice of methods should be justified.
  • Findings: the results should be presented clearly, with visualisations where required. Quotes should be edited consistently and properly referenced.
  • Discussion: should describe the key findings, the strengths and weaknesses of the work, and how the key findings relate to other relevant studies. It should also include any policy, practice or research implications and/or recommendations.
  1. Debate articles are opinion pieces on an issue relevant to the relationship between evidence and policy. Such articles analyse the state of the field in a particular area, and/or critically discuss new evidence-related initiatives, fields or burning issues. Typically, debate articles take a point of controversy about evidence use or related issues, in academia, policy or practice, and construct a supporting argument. For example, they could focus on the use of a particular methodology, bring in concepts from new fields to the evidence/policy debate, or discuss the implications of a change in policy on evidence generation, funding or use. Shorter papers of up to 3,000 words are encouraged, but the maximum limit is 5,000. This includes the references and tables, but not the abstract, key words or key messages. All articles must have the following sections:
  • Up to four keywords.
  • ‘Key messages’: summarising the main messages from the paper in up to four bullet points. The contribution made by the paper to the field should be clear from these key messages. Each bullet point must be less than 100 characters.
  • Abstract: a structured abstract (up to 250 words), reporting the background, key points for discussion, conclusions and implications
  • Background: explaining the nature and importance of the issue being addressed and describing previous work in the area (if any), with relevant references
  • Discussion, conclusions and implications of the piece.
  1. Practice papers are a description and critique of a project or process by which evidence was or could be applied to policy and practice, from the point of view of a practitioner, decision maker or researcher. This might include: a description and critique of the means by which existing evidence was or could be determined and assessed in order to inform policy or practice; a description and critique of a means by which evidence was or could be disseminated to policy makers or practitioners; a description and critique of an initiative in which policy makers or practitioners are informed about research evidence or encouraged to use it; a description and critique of ways in which policy makers or practitioners have used (or developed) evidence in their work; or a description or critique of efforts to improve systems, processes and relationships around evidence within an organisation. Practice papers are especially welcome that provide accounts by policy makers and practitioners of their work; researchers may wish to share experiences of knowledge translation or collaboration with practitioners or policy makers. Ideally, practice papers set the work in the context of current debates around evidence and policy.

    Shorter papers of up to 3,000 words are encouraged, but the maximum limit is 5,000. This includes the references and tables, but not the abstract, key words or key messages. All articles must have the following sections:
  • Up to four keywords.
  • ‘Key messages’: summarising the main messages from the paper, in up to four bullet points. The contribution made by the paper to the field should be clear from these key messages. Each bullet point must be less than 100 characters.
  • Abstract: a structured abstract (up to 250 words), which reports on the background, aims and objectives and key conclusions of the paper.
  • Background: explaining the nature and importance of the issue being addressed and the policy or practice context, and showing awareness of key relevant literature, theories or models. The relationship of the authors(s) to the project, programme or strategy should be clearly explained.
  • One of the following:
    • An assessment or critique: this should include: a) sufficient information about the current situation for the critique to be understandable; b) discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of the current programme, project or strategy, including reference to any previous evaluations (if any); c) recommendations, and their implications. This should not be presented as formal research, which should be submitted a research paper.
    • A description of good practice: this should include: a) relevant aims and objectives of the practice; b) a description of what it includes; c) how this achieves the aims and objectives and (if relevant) how it improves on previous practice; d) a reflection of the strengths and weaknesses of the practice and whether further improvements could be made.
  1. Sources & Resources are bibliographic references with brief abstract, or short pieces of up to 2500 words in length. Submissions for Sources & Resources:
  • may provide details of recent publications or other work relating to the processes of research, dissemination or implementation of evidence-based policy and practice for inclusion in the section Lessons from the Literature (although it is not possible to acknowledge in print the person who provides this information).
  • may be short reports of completed research studies that the journal is not able to publish in full. These short research reports summarise the authorship, aims, methods and outcomes of a study and its contribution to the advancement of the relationship between evidence and policy. These may be refereed at the discretion of the Managing Editor.
  • may be short report on a relevant conference, or a book review, but this should be agreed with the Managing Editors before beginning.
Back to top

How to Submit

All submissions should be made online at the Evidence & Policy Editorial Manager website: http://evidpol.edmgr.com/, in Word or Rich Text Format (not pdf). New users should first create an account, specify their areas of interest and provide full contact details. During the submission process, there are separate sections for preliminary details, such as title, author, affiliations, abstract, key messages and keywords, and these should not be included in the main text of the submission; this must also be completely anonymised. Please note: submissions that, in the opinion of the editors, have not been sufficiently anonymised for review will be returned to authors. All submissions (except short reports for Sources & Resources) will be subject to anonymous peer-review processes by referees currently working in the appropriate field. The editors aim to provide quick decisions and to ensure that submission to publication takes the minimum possible time. The final decision on publication rests with the managing editors. Accepted papers will be fast-tracked online after copy editing and typesetting; all papers will appear in hard copy issues, but the timing of publication is at the discretion of the editors.

When papers are accepted for publication, authors are encouraged to submit a lay or non-technical summary of their piece for publication in the Policy Press blog. For more information, please contact pp-marketing@bristol.ac.uk.

Back to top

Copyright & Permissions

Articles are considered for publication on the understanding that on acceptance the entire copyright shall pass to Policy Press as publisher of Evidence & Policy. Authors will be asked to sign a copyright agreement to this effect. All authors should agree to the copyright assignment. For jointly authored articles, the corresponding author may sign on behalf of co-authors provided that s/he has obtained their consent for copyright assignment. When submitting online, the copyright assignment agreement is considered to be signed when the corresponding author checks the relevant box. The copyright assignment agreement can be read here.

Where copyright is not owned by the author(s), the corresponding author is responsible for obtaining the consent of the copyright holder. This includes figures, tables, and excerpts. Evidence of this permission should be provided to Policy Press.

General information on rights and permissions can be found here: http://policypress.co.uk/rights-permissions.

To request permission to reproduce any part of articles published in Evidence & Policy please email Policy Press: pp-info@bristol.ac.uk

Gold Open Access publishing (making articles freely available to the reader under a variety of CC-BY licences) is also available upon payment of an Article Processing Charge, and authors are encouraged to consider this where possible. The Open Access status of an article in no way influences its chance of acceptance or review, and payment should only be made after acceptance.  See https://policypress.co.uk/open-access for further details.

Please also read our Journals Editorial Policies and Ethics Guidelines.

Back to top

Style

  • British English spelling and punctuation is preferred.
  • Non-discriminatory language is mandatory.
  • Explanatory notes should be kept to a minimum. If it is necessary to use them, they must be numbered consecutively in the text and listed at the end of the article. Please do not embed notes in the text.
  • Please do not embed bibliographic references in the text, footnotes, live links or macros; the final submitted file should be clear of track changes and ready for print.
  • Tables and charts should be separated from the text and submitted in a Word or Excel file, with their placement in the text clearly indicated by inserting: ‘Table X here’. Please provide numbers, titles and sources (where appropriate).
  • Figures, diagrams and maps should be separated from the text and, ideally, submitted in an Encapsulated PostScript (.eps) file. Figures created in Word or Excel are acceptable in those file formats. If the figures, diagrams and maps are in other formats (i.e. have been pasted into a Word file rather than created in it) please contact dave.j.worth@bristol.ac.uk for advice. Please indicate where figures should be placed in the text, by inserting: ‘Figure X here’ and provide numbers, titles and sources (where appropriate).

Further guidance may be found in the Policy Press editorial guidelines

Back to top

References

A custom version of the Harvard system of referencing is used:

  • In-text citations: give the author’s surname followed by year of publication in brackets, e.g. (Smith 1999) or (Smith et al. 1999)
  • List all references in full at the end of the article and remove any references not cited in the text
  • All authors should be listed
  • Book and journal titles should be in italics
  • Website details should be placed at the end of the reference. Do not include dates of access to websites
  • Spell out all acronyms in the first instance.

Example of book reference

Dorling, D, 2010, Injustice: Why social inequality persists, Bristol: Policy Press

 

Example of journal reference

Guckert, M, Mastropieri, MA, Scruggs, TE, 2016, Personalizing research: Special educators’ awareness of evidence-based practice, Exceptionality 24, 2, 63-78
 

Example of chapter within edited / multi-authored publication 

Levitas, R, 2011, Utopia calling: Eradicating child poverty in the United Kingdom and beyond, in A. Minujin and S. Nandy (eds) Global child poverty and well-being: Measurement, concepts, policy and action, Bristol: Policy Press, 449–73

 

Example of website reference

House of Commons Debates, 2010, Work and pensions (CSR), Hansard, 4 November, col 337WH, www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201011/cmhansrd/cm101104/halltext/101104h0001.htm

Back to top

English Language Editing Service
Policy Press collaborates with Enago to provide Academic English editing and translation services to help authors get their manuscript submission-ready. A special 20% discount is available to all Policy Press authors. Find out more at: https://www.enago.com/policypress.

Back to top




Integration and Implementation Insights Blog

Evidence and Policy encourages you to blog about your paper. If your paper is about a research implementation concept or method, you may receive an invitation to contribute to the I2Insights blog (http://I2Insights.org) and you should also feel free to approach them to contribute. When your blog post is published, Evidence and Policy will make your paper free to access for one month (if it is not already available in open-access). To contact the blog editor, Gabriele Bammer, please email: Gabriele.Bammer@anu.edu.au.

Back to top

Contact Us

If you have queries regarding the submission process, please email the Evidence & Policy office for assistance: evidence-and-policy@kcl.ac.uk.

Back to top